Re: is shapeSlur broken?

lilypond-user

[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: is shapeSlur broken?

From:	David Nalesnik
Subject:	Re: is shapeSlur broken?
Date:	Fri, 11 May 2012 06:30:32 -0500

> So:
> \shape #"Slur" #'( ...

Looks awful. Why not call it with the syntax used for any override?

\shape Slur #'( ...

Yes, it is pretty horrible. I didn't realize that LilyPond would accept strings not enclosed in double quotes.

Thanks,

David

[Prev in Thread]

Current Thread

[Next in Thread]

Re: is shapeSlur broken?, (continued)

Prev by Date: Re: Output for tablet or smartphone
Next by Date: Re: is shapeSlur broken?
Previous by thread: Re: is shapeSlur broken?
Next by thread: Re: is shapeSlur broken?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread