[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: articulate.ly with "rall" not working?
From: |
Malte Meyn |
Subject: |
Re: articulate.ly with "rall" not working? |
Date: |
Tue, 13 Mar 2012 20:06:12 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:10.0.2) Gecko/20120216 Thunderbird/10.0.2 |
On 13.03.2012 03:52, Peter Chubb wrote:
>>>>>> "Thomas" == Thomas Morley <address@hidden> writes:
>
> Thomas> \version "2.14.2" \include "articulate.ly"
>
> Thomas> \score { \unfoldRepeats \articulate << \relative c' { c8-. d-.
> Thomas> e-. f-. g-.-"rall" f-. e-. d-. c-. d-. e-. f-. g-.
> Thomas> f-. e-. d-. c1-. }
>>>>
> Thomas> \midi { } }
>
> The rallentendo actually does happen, but at the tempo you're going, it's not
> paticularly deep.
>
> If I add a \displayLilyMusic before the \unfoldRepeats I see:
>
> << {
> { c'8*1/2 r } { d' r } { e' r } { f' r } { \set tempoWholesPerMinute =
> #(ly:make-moment 9 1 0 1)
>
>
> { g'-"rall" r } } { f' r } { e' r } { d' r } { c' r } { d' r } { e' r
> } { f' r } { g' r } { f' r } { e' r } { d' r } { c'1*1/2 r }
> } >>
>
>
> Note the setting of tempoWholesPerMinute. This corresponds to a 40% slowdown.
> The default is MM crotchet=60, this should slow down to about MM
> crotchet=36. However, note this is the *only* tempo adjustment ---
> you need to start with a tempo.
>
> I suggest
> \version "2.14.2"
> \include "articulate.ly"
>
> \score {
> \displayLilyMusic \unfoldRepeats \articulate
> <<
> \relative c' {
> \set tempoWholesPerMinute = #(ly:make-moment 4 80)
> c8-. d-. e-. f-.
> g-.-"rall" f-. e-. d-.
> c-. d-. e-. f-.
> g-. f-. e-. d-.
> c1-.
> }
> >>
> \midi { }
> }
>
> --
> Dr Peter Chubb peter.chubb AT
> nicta.com.au
> http://www.ssrg.nicta.com.au Software Systems Research Group/NICTA
>
Hm. I see two problems:
1. Did I understand right, that -"rall" changes the tempo in a single
step? That’s more like “subito meno mosso” than “rallentando”, isn’t it?.
2. \set tempoWholesPerMinute doesn’t have any effect in the midi output.
Is that a bug or a misunderstanding? I use Lilypond 2.14.2-1 Linux 64.