[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: LSR updates: was: polychords: a working solution
From: |
Thomas Morley |
Subject: |
Re: LSR updates: was: polychords: a working solution |
Date: |
Sun, 4 Mar 2012 00:14:24 +0100 |
Hi David,
2012/3/3 David Nalesnik <address@hidden>:
> Hi Harm,
>
>>
>> I attached a tarball with all fixed files (hope it's not to big).
>> Perhaps you could test compiling them. IIRC you use windows, it should
>> make no difference, but who knows ...
>
>
> Everything compiles :) All I get are warnings with a few of the files.
> I've attached the trimmed-down results.
>
> I'll get back to you soon about the text you want me to look at.
>
> -David
>
>
thanks for your effort.
I know about most of the warnings. I think they can be disregarded.
But I'm a little bit puzzled about these:
warning: No glyph found for alteration: 54/125 (etc)
warning: Could not find glyph-name for alteration 17/1000
warning: Incomplete keyAlterationOrder for key signature
warning: MIDI channel wrapped around
warning: remapping modulo 16
I never saw them before during my testings. And I can't appraise them.
Best,
Harm
- Re: LSR updates: was: polychords: a working solution, David Nalesnik, 2012/03/01
- Re: LSR updates: was: polychords: a working solution, Thomas Morley, 2012/03/01
- Re: LSR updates: was: polychords: a working solution, David Nalesnik, 2012/03/01
- Re: LSR updates: was: polychords: a working solution, Thomas Morley, 2012/03/03
- Re: LSR updates: was: polychords: a working solution, David Nalesnik, 2012/03/03
- Re: LSR updates: was: polychords: a working solution,
Thomas Morley <=
- Re: LSR updates: was: polychords: a working solution, Phil Holmes, 2012/03/04
- Re: LSR updates: was: polychords: a working solution, James, 2012/03/04
- Re: LSR updates: was: polychords: a working solution, Thomas Morley, 2012/03/04
- Re: LSR updates: was: polychords: a working solution, Phil Holmes, 2012/03/04
- Re: LSR updates: was: polychords: a working solution, David Nalesnik, 2012/03/04
- Re: LSR updates: was: polychords: a working solution, Thomas Morley, 2012/03/04
- Re: LSR updates: was: polychords: a working solution, Graham Percival, 2012/03/04
- Re: LSR updates: was: polychords: a working solution, David Nalesnik, 2012/03/04
- Re: LSR updates: was: polychords: a working solution, Thomas Morley, 2012/03/04
- Re: LSR updates: was: polychords: a working solution, David Nalesnik, 2012/03/04