[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: My own Figured Bass number set, where do I start?
From: |
Reinhold Kainhofer |
Subject: |
Re: My own Figured Bass number set, where do I start? |
Date: |
Mon, 20 Feb 2012 14:44:41 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:9.0) Gecko/20111229 Thunderbird/9.0 |
On 20/02/2012 14:18, Nils wrote:
> my pusblisher wants baroque figured bass gylphs. They have the strokes in
> different places than the Lilypond versions.
> I guess nobobdy did this so far, so I have to do it myself.
Yes, we have a feature request
(http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=2042 ), but no one
has done any work on it.
> Where is the point in the code where I have to start? I want to do it right
> and use the same lilypond syntax like 4\+ or 6\\.
I suppose that the proper way would be to create new glyphs in our fonts
(using metafont, source file mf/feta-numbers.mf) and then adjust the
format-bass-figure function (in scm/translation-functions.scm) to use
those glyphs for the slashed figures.
You could of course try to modify format-bass-figure without touching
the fonts, but then it will always look like the figures in Robert
Kelly's table, where a + or a ` is stacked onto a normal digit, clearly
showing they are two different glyphs.
Cheers,
Reinhold
--
------------------------------------------------------------------
Reinhold Kainhofer, address@hidden, http://reinhold.kainhofer.com/
* Financial & Actuarial Math., Vienna Univ. of Technology, Austria
* http://www.fam.tuwien.ac.at/, DVR: 0005886
* LilyPond, Music typesetting, http://www.lilypond.org