[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: polychords: a working solution
From: |
Graham Percival |
Subject: |
Re: polychords: a working solution |
Date: |
Sat, 18 Feb 2012 00:25:03 +0000 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) |
On Sat, Feb 18, 2012 at 01:06:18AM +0100, Thomas Morley wrote:
> Following the link to 7.2 Adding and editing snippets I read:
> "If the new snippet uses new features that are not available in the
> current LSR version, the snippet should be added to
> ‘Documentation/snippets/new’ and a reference should be added to the
> manual. ... "
>
> Is this sth a normal user can do?
Not directly. A new user can create a snippet, but then it needs
to go to a developer to add it. James Lowe would normally
volunteer for that, but his village is stuck on 1.4 kb/s bandwidth
at the moment.
Unfortunately nobody has organized updating LSR to 2.14, so there
will be more and more cases where users want to help but don't
have a realistic way to do so. This is certainly regrettable, but
I've been sounding the alarm about this for many months. There
was one volunteer for this task, but a health problem resulted in
him drastically cutting back on his lilypond work. Nobody else
has offered to do it.
- Graham
- Re: polychords: a working solution, (continued)
- Re: polychords: a working solution, James, 2012/02/03
- Re: polychords: a working solution, Tim McNamara, 2012/02/03
- Re: polychords: a working solution, Janek Warchoł, 2012/02/03
- Re: polychords: a working solution, Carl Sorensen, 2012/02/03
- Re: polychords: a working solution, Tim McNamara, 2012/02/03
- Re: polychords: a working solution, Thomas Morley, 2012/02/05
- Re: polychords: a working solution, Jean-Alexis Montignies, 2012/02/05
- Re: polychords: a working solution, Thomas Morley, 2012/02/16
- Re: polychords: a working solution, David Kastrup, 2012/02/17
- Re: polychords: a working solution, Thomas Morley, 2012/02/17
- Re: polychords: a working solution,
Graham Percival <=
- Re: polychords: a working solution, Thomas Morley, 2012/02/17
- Re: polychords: a working solution, David Nalesnik, 2012/02/17
- Re: polychords: a working solution, James, 2012/02/17
- Re: polychords: a working solution, Phil Holmes, 2012/02/18
- Re: polychords: a working solution, Graham Percival, 2012/02/18
- Re: polychords: a working solution, Phil Holmes, 2012/02/18
- Re: polychords: a working solution, Graham Percival, 2012/02/18
- Re: polychords: a working solution, Phil Holmes, 2012/02/18
- Re: polychords: a working solution, Graham Percival, 2012/02/18
- Re: polychords: a working solution, Phil Holmes, 2012/02/18