[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: User vs Developer: Round 2 (and half-time?) (was: Re: music font)
From: |
Janek Warchoł |
Subject: |
Re: User vs Developer: Round 2 (and half-time?) (was: Re: music font) |
Date: |
Tue, 24 Jan 2012 01:50:13 +0100 |
Dear Xavier,
hereby i'd like to thank you for your time spent on helping LilyPond!
It's true that user's work often is not appreciated enough.
2012/1/23 Xavier Scheuer <address@hidden>:
> Dear Graham, dear Developers,
> why I never *demand*
> developers to fix an issue, even if it is one that is really annoying
> my ego in almost every score I typeset. Sometimes when an issue has
> been unfixed for years and when I see people often being troubled by
> this issue I post a message stating it and thus moving this issue "from
> the bottom of the pile".
One thing comes to my mind: you are talking about bugs that annoy many
people, and they waste a lot of your own time. Have you considered
organizing a collective bounty to fix that bug? If i remember
correctly, David is interested in working on Lily for money; there may
be others. If you find 20 people annoyed by a bug and each one gives
10$, that's something!
For example i'm interested in sponsoring bugfixes and new features,
but there's no way i can afford to hire someone myself (200-500$? i'm
a student!). But i'm definately interested in giving 10$ for each of
the bugs that affect my Lily workflow.
> My main goal was to
> attract attention to Emilio's nice project of music font with LilyPond.
> I attracted Graham's attention on me instead.
Well, you asked for Graham's attention when you cc'd him. I think
cc'ing him was a mistake, because:
- his function as administrator means that he won't do stuff like this
(help someone with music font)
- he clearly declared that he won't even try to talk other people into
doing anything.
Thus, no point in cc'ing Graham - expect for being
> bitten by the red ants' queen!
That's not a surprise. Graham's sensitivity is well-known, especially
in this context. I know that you didn't want to offend Graham (i
wouldn't be offended if i were on Graham's place), but nevertheless
Graham felt offended. The only thing we can do about it is to write
e-mails in a way that not only seems polite to us, but also will be
received as polite by Graham (or whoever the recipient is) - it's
hard, i know.
(actually i think things would be easier for Graham if he were less
sensitive, but it's his choice and he can do whatever he likes - even
if it's difficult for us)
Recently i seriously offended David without intentions to do so at all
- it was also a miscommunication :(
cheers,
Janek
- User vs Developer: Round 2 (and half-time?) (was: Re: music font), Xavier Scheuer, 2012/01/22
- Re: User vs Developer: Round 2 (and half-time?) (was: Re: music font), Tim McNamara, 2012/01/22
- Re: User vs Developer: Round 2 (and half-time?) (was: Re: music font), Christopher R. Maden, 2012/01/22
- Re: User vs Developer: Round 2 (and half-time?) (was: Re: music font),
Janek Warchoł <=
- Re: user vs. user (was: User vs Developer: Round 2 (and half-time?) (was: Re: music font), Tim McNamara, 2012/01/24
- Re: user vs. user, David Kastrup, 2012/01/24
- Re: user vs. user (was: User vs Developer: Round 2 (and half-time?) (was: Re: music font), Federico Bruni, 2012/01/24
- Re: user vs. user (was: User vs Developer: Round 2 (and half-time?) (was: Re: music font), Shane Brandes, 2012/01/24
- Re: user vs. user (was: User vs Developer: Round 2 (and half-time?), Federico Bruni, 2012/01/24
Re: User vs Developer: Round 2 (and half-time?), David Kastrup, 2012/01/24