lilypond-user
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Lilypond lobbying?


From: Joseph Wakeling
Subject: Re: Lilypond lobbying?
Date: Thu, 25 Aug 2011 20:00:25 +0200
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.18) Gecko/20110617 Lightning/1.0b2 Thunderbird/3.1.11

On 08/25/2011 05:48 PM, Christopher R. Maden wrote:
> Well — and here is the case for MusicXML support again — they are likely
> to *import* the LaTeX into their production process.

Yes, good STM typesetting providers will do this -- but not all do.  I
speak from both the experience of having perfect (and uncomplicated)
LaTeX articles mangled at the typsetting phase by journals, and also
having sourced typsetting services for a new STM publisher.

> A solid, basic MusicXML export would make it possible for the publisher
> to get at the meat of the composition and then apply their house style.

I'm curious -- to what extent DO music publishers actually make use of
MusicXML?  It's never been clear to me what purpose it really serves, or
when and where it's really used.



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]