|
From: | Urs Liska |
Subject: | Re: Lilypond lobbying? |
Date: | Thu, 25 Aug 2011 13:49:49 +0200 |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:6.0) Gecko/20110812 Thunderbird/6.0 |
Am 25.08.2011 13:42, schrieb Kieren MacMillan:
Hi Joseph,the fact that Lilypond may get so many things right initially is not an issue when it's so much more tricky to make (and validate) small manual corrections.Yes. Yes. Yes. And IMO the **VALIDATION** is the worst part: I don't mind taking the few seconds to type the tweak for a slur, but when I'm working on a big score (e.g., on of my operas or musicals), it is incredibly painful to have to wait several minutes in order to see the result (especially if it didn't work for some reason, so that I have to do it again).
For this you can use Score.skipTypesetting.This works quite fine in most cases, but is awkward to handle, because you have to move the start and stop points manually.
A GUI tool could implement something to ease this.
And I'm a Lilypond evangelist. =( Cheers, Kieren. _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list address@hidden https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |