[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: More vertical spacing confusion
From: |
David Kastrup |
Subject: |
Re: More vertical spacing confusion |
Date: |
Wed, 03 Aug 2011 14:36:14 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
Joe Neeman <address@hidden> writes:
>> So I have several questions:
>>
>> - Is the behaviour I am experiencing (a system spilling over onto a
>> second page) correct or a bug? If correct, what's the best way to
>> avoid the spillage?
>
> \paper {
> ragged-last-bottom = ##f
> }
>
> By default, ragged-last-bottom is ##t, so lilypond has no incentive to
> avoid that dangling system on page 2.
I don't understand this "so".
The following should still be penalized since they are deficiencies even
on a ragged bottom:
a) a page which is considerably less full than the previous page
b) every page break, and most certainly inside of a system, should carry
a penalty, giving Lilypond some incentive to compress systems iff it
helps to avoid using more pages than necessary.
--
David Kastrup
- Re: More vertical spacing confusion, Keith OHara, 2011/08/01
- Re: More vertical spacing confusion, Joe Neeman, 2011/08/03
- Re: More vertical spacing confusion,
David Kastrup <=
- Re: More vertical spacing confusion, David Kastrup, 2011/08/03
- Re: More vertical spacing confusion, Adam Spiers, 2011/08/04
- Re: More vertical spacing confusion, David Kastrup, 2011/08/04
- Re: More vertical spacing confusion, Adam Spiers, 2011/08/04
- Re: More vertical spacing confusion, David Kastrup, 2011/08/04
- Re: More vertical spacing confusion, Joe Neeman, 2011/08/04
- Re: More vertical spacing confusion, David Kastrup, 2011/08/05