lilypond-user
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: where's the slur? (4 year old question)


From: Villum Sejersen
Subject: Re: where's the slur? (4 year old question)
Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2011 09:07:12 +0200
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.1.16) Gecko/20110702 Icedove/3.0.11

>Eluze wrote:

>> Villum Sejersen wrote:
>> 
>> Separating out the voices instead  of the chord construct seems to do 
>> what you want:
>> 
>> \version "2.15.6"
>> voiceA = { \slurUp e'( d') }
>> voiceB = { \tieUp c'~ c' }
>> voiceC = { \tieDown a ~ a }
>> 
>> \new Staff <<
>>    \time 2/2
>>    \voiceA
>>    \voiceB
>>    \voiceC
>>  >>>>
>> 
>> Experimenting with various combinations of \tieUp / \tieDown give 
>> slightly different results, but the slur and  ties are attached to the 
>> right notes.
>> 

> it seems i can't get VoiceB (the c's) to have a tie going up (with version 2.15.5)!

Neither can I, at least not without any tweaks or overrides. :)

> this works in one voice (without to many tweaks)!
> { 
>   \tieDown 
>   \slurUp 
>   <e' c' -\tweak #'direction #1 ~ a  ~ >>2( <d' c' a>> )
> }

>From a score-readability point-of-view Keith O'Hara's solution no.1 is clearly the best I have seen so far.

The following is yet another experiment, but without tweaks resulting in all stems down:

voiceD = { \stemUp e'^( d') }
voiceE = { \stemUp c'_~ c' }
voiceF = { \stemDown a ~ a }

\new Staff <<
  \time 2/2
  \voiceD
  \voiceE
  \voiceF
>>


> cheers
> Eluze


-- 
Yours,  Villum Sejersen
Nørregade  1 A
DK-4500  Nykøbing Sj.

Attachment: KOH1solution.png
Description: PNG image


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]