[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: transpose
From: |
Francisco Vila |
Subject: |
Re: transpose |
Date: |
Fri, 3 Jun 2011 09:41:11 +0200 |
2011/6/3 Peter O'Doherty <address@hidden>:
> On 06/03/2011 12:45 AM, Francisco Vila wrote:
>>
>> 2011/6/2 Peter O'Doherty<address@hidden>:
>>>
>>> Thank you all for your help. David's solution was just the one I needed.
>>> Best wishes,
>>> Peter
>>
>> Here is a beautiful example of something I've been suspecting for
>> months. No matter how fast I reply to a question in this list, my
>> reply only reaches other recipients's mailboxes after several hours.
>> :-(
>
> I'm not sure if that's correct. I sent my original message at 17:00 but
> didn't reply until 20:38. The delay was therefore mine. (I'm also replying
> to this message at 07:48 after receiving it at 12:45!)
Oh, I am not blaming you. My concern is, my reply was 15 minutes after
your first message, and every single further answer seems to ignore
that one. That occurred _many_ times in this list, and it's really
discouraging. I can only guess the problem is that my own messages
last hours to reach others. Or maybe reading previous replies before
writing a new one is not as common as I thought.
--
Francisco Vila. Badajoz (Spain)
www.paconet.org , www.csmbadajoz.com
- transpose, Peter O'Doherty, 2011/06/02
- Re: transpose, Francisco Vila, 2011/06/02
- Re: transpose, Phil Holmes, 2011/06/02
- RE: transpose, James Lowe, 2011/06/02
- Re: transpose, David Bobroff, 2011/06/02
- Re: transpose, Ole Schmidt, 2011/06/02