|
From: | Fr. Michael Gilmary, mma |
Subject: | Re: font use |
Date: | Tue, 26 Apr 2011 09:48:13 -0400 |
On Apr 26 AD 2011, at 2:21 AM, James Lowe wrote:
Yes, I saw that thread and it's certainly related to what I'm looking for ... but the font I've been using almost exclusively for the last several years has all the glyphs and tables needed. In fact, I've been using XeLaTeX with Lilypond successfully for all that time (since about 2008). Only since I've obtained 2.13 did I notice the change in font handling --- both a change in ligature use and optical size selection. I'm also on the same OS since I began using Lilypond and friends (Mac OS 10.4.11). While the source code has not changed from 3 years ago (in the example I sent last time) the results definitely have changed. Even if I don't specify the font, the default font used by Lilypond no longer renders the ligatures either --- although that used to work, too. I've tried to go back to v. 2.12 and the problem is still there. I can't get v. 2.11 to work since it complains about something in lilypond-book and returns a "Child 11" or something like that .... So, IF the engine now needs some explicit call to use ligatures as before, does anyone know what that is? United in adoration of Jesus, fr. michael gilmary, mma Most Holy Trinity Monastery 67 Dugway Road Petersham, MA 01366 www.MaroniteMonks.org |
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |