lilypond-user
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: status of mutopia project


From: Music Teacher
Subject: Re: status of mutopia project
Date: Sat, 9 Apr 2011 09:20:49 -0500

Out of topic??? Tis lilypond and the thread is mutopia, what that???

2011/4/8, address@hidden <address@hidden>:
>
>
>      Unfortunately, there is an obvious error in Bach Goldberg
> Aria bar 18 that I have seen propagated to several other versions
> that have used this as source. Not good.
>
>    -steve
>
>> 2011/4/8 Francisco Vila <address@hidden>
>>>
>>> 2011/4/8 steve <address@hidden>:
>>> > Howdy!
>>> >
>>> >   Hope this isn't too OT, but can't get any info anywhere else..
>>> >
>>> >   What is the status of the mutopiaproject http://mutopiaproject.org
>>> ??
>>> >
>>> >   I have discovered errors in goldberg aria, reported them to
>>> > all contacts, even added corrected source files. Also just
>>> > recently tried to subscribe to mailing list at mutopiaproject and
>>> > the subscription request(s) bounced!!  This has been going on
>>> > for at least a year. No corrections, no acknowledgement, no contact
>>> > at all??
>>> >
>>> >    Is this project dead?
>>>
>>> Sadly yes it is, in practice.  Latest updates are dec 2010 (four
>>> posts). Any posts previous to those 4 are a year old.  I'd love that
>>> Petrucci Music Library http://imslp.org/wiki/ supported maintaining of
>>> source lilypond files in the same site.  Sceaux and others just link
>>> to their own sites for sources.
>>
>> At least we can be thankful that the project website is still available...
>>
>>> Maybe it is a good thing that freely available scores mix scanned and
>>> typeset documents whatever their origin or the software used; but no
>>> doubt that completely free scores are only possible if you have the
>>> source _and_ the typesetting engine is free as in freedom (i.e. Finale
>>> documents are useless for me for a triple reason: I need a costly
>>> software to see them, even if a viewer is available at zero cost I
>>> still can not hack the score, and even if I could, I am not free
>>> because that viewer is prorietary software).
>>
>> Any Linux user has at least one more reason - finale doesn't run on
>> Linux...
>>
>> cheers,
>> Janek
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> lilypond-user mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
>



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]