[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Double Digit Fingering ie 10 11 12
From: |
James Lowe |
Subject: |
Re: Double Digit Fingering ie 10 11 12 |
Date: |
Wed, 9 Mar 2011 23:18:23 +0000 |
User-agent: |
Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.2.0.101115 |
Hello
-----Original Message-----
From: Robin Bannister <address@hidden>
Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2011 00:00:07 +0100
To: <address@hidden>, LilyPond User <address@hidden>
Subject: Re: Double Digit Fingering ie 10 11 12
>This is hardcoded. See
>http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/2009-04/msg00691.html
>
>
From:Robin Bannister
Subject:Re: Fingerings with Flat SymbolDate:
Tue, 21 Apr 2009 11:18:17 +0200
Jonathan Townes wrote:
the use of fingerings would be much faster and require less typing
This nice aspect of fingerings is due to the parser knowing what a
fingering looks like. But this is defined as being a single digit, so you
only have ten things you can ask for (corresponding to 0 .. 9).
Writing your own version of fingering::calc-text lets you choose what
these ten things are, but you can't get any more than ten.
So you are limited to ten combinations, which is nowhere near enough.
Cheers,
Robin
---
If this is true I can add an @knownissue in the Notation Reference at
least. Unless anyone objects?
James
- Double Digit Fingering ie 10 11 12, bannersite, 2011/03/08
- Re: Double Digit Fingering ie 10 11 12, Robin Bannister, 2011/03/09
- Re: Double Digit Fingering ie 10 11 12,
James Lowe <=
- Re: Double Digit Fingering ie 10 11 12, Neil Puttock, 2011/03/10
- RE: Double Digit Fingering ie 10 11 12, James Lowe, 2011/03/10
- Re: Double Digit Fingering ie 10 11 12, Neil Puttock, 2011/03/10
- RE: Double Digit Fingering ie 10 11 12, James Lowe, 2011/03/10
- Re: Double Digit Fingering ie 10 11 12, Neil Puttock, 2011/03/10
- Re: Double Digit Fingering ie 10 11 12, James Lowe, 2011/03/10