[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
2.13.48 not good IMO
|
From: |
胡海鹏 - Hu Haipeng |
|
Subject: |
2.13.48 not good IMO |
|
Date: |
Tue, 8 Feb 2011 12:42:02 +0800 (CST) |
Hello,
I think 2.13.48 is not as good as 2.13.46. I compiled the work I'm working on, in 46, it takes 45 pages, with only a (de)crescendo too small warning; while in 48, it takes 48 pages, and gives many that warnings.
Haipeng
- 2.13.48 not good IMO,
胡海鹏 - Hu Haipeng <=