[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Bug in ties over barlines
From: |
Joseph Haig |
Subject: |
Re: Bug in ties over barlines |
Date: |
Tue, 25 Jan 2011 14:49:23 +0000 |
Thanks to everyone who responded and explained that Lilypond's
behaviour is correct, and that it is possible to use
set-accidental-style to get the behaviour I expected. I agree with
Janek that the theoretically correct behaviour can be confusing but I
understand better now the differences between ties and slurs.
On 24 January 2011 08:54, Phil Holmes <address@hidden> wrote:
> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Jan Warchoł"
> <address@hidden>
>
>> I don't agree. *Theoretically* accidental is not needed, but if it
>> would be omitted, how can you tell the difference between aes~ | aes
>> and aes( | a) ?
>> In my opinion accidental here is necessary (surely it may be
>> parenthesized). If it's necessary, it should be printed automatically
>> in my opinion.
>
>> cheers,
>> Janek
>
> If you use
>
> #(set-accidental-style 'modern-cautionary)
>
> then you get the parenthesised accidental automatically, as requested.
>
>
> --
> Phil Holmes
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> lilypond-user mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
>
- Bug in ties over barlines, Joseph Haig, 2011/01/23
- Re: Bug in ties over barlines, Jan Warchoł, 2011/01/23
- Re: Bug in ties over barlines, James Bailey, 2011/01/23
- Re: Bug in ties over barlines, Xavier Scheuer, 2011/01/23
- Re: Bug in ties over barlines, Jan Warchoł, 2011/01/23
- Re: Bug in ties over barlines, Phil Holmes, 2011/01/24
- Re: Bug in ties over barlines,
Joseph Haig <=
- Re: Bug in ties over barlines, Jan Warchoł, 2011/01/31
- Re: Bug in ties over barlines, Carl Sorensen, 2011/01/31
- Re: Bug in ties over barlines, Alexander Kobel, 2011/01/31
- Re: Bug in ties over barlines, James Lowe, 2011/01/31
- Re: Bug in ties over barlines, Alexander Kobel, 2011/01/31