[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Odd output
From: |
Neil Puttock |
Subject: |
Re: Odd output |
Date: |
Fri, 17 Dec 2010 23:37:18 +0000 |
On 17 December 2010 23:09, James Lowe <address@hidden> wrote:
> I am not a vocal specialist but just using this one simplistic example of C
> seems erroneous. Isn't the idea of the notes printed at the same moment to
> show that they need to be sung at the same moment if you see what I mean? Yes
> I am sure that a vocalist can make their own mind up, but if that is the
> reasoning then it doesn't matter what we use then does it and you can provide
> instruction accordingly.
I've only seen this notation in piano music (I guess Phil's Mikado
example is part of the piano reduction accompanying the voices),
whereby the melodic line is kept separate from the accompaniment.
Attached is another example from the Mikuli edition of Chopin's
Impromptu in G flat major.
Cheers,
Neil
impromptu.png
Description: PNG image
- Re: Odd output, (continued)
Re: Odd output, Tim McNamara, 2010/12/10
Re: Odd output, Keith OHara, 2010/12/17
- Re: Odd output, Phil Holmes, 2010/12/17
- Re: Odd output, Keith OHara, 2010/12/17
- Re: Odd output, Michael Ellis, 2010/12/17
- RE: Odd output, James Lowe, 2010/12/17
- Re: Odd output, Michael Ellis, 2010/12/17
- Re: Odd output,
Neil Puttock <=
- Re: Odd output, Phil Holmes, 2010/12/18
- Re: Odd output, Michael Ellis, 2010/12/18
- Re: Odd output, Phil Holmes, 2010/12/18
Docs: automatic accidentals (was: Odd output), Keith OHara, 2010/12/18
Re: Docs: automatic accidentals, James Lowe, 2010/12/19
Re: Odd output, Phil Holmes, 2010/12/18
Re: Odd output, Keith OHara, 2010/12/25
Re: Odd output, Marco Correia, 2010/12/10