On Sun, Dec 12, 2010 at 3:19 AM, Jan Warchoł
<address@hidden> wrote:
Hi all,
2010/12/10 Marco Correia <address@hidden>:
> Thanks!
>
> I can't believe that this is seen as a low priority enhancement...! This
> completely renders lilypond unusable for the task I need it, which is to serve
> as a printer for computer generated music. The output is not ugly - it is
> plain wrong!
I agree with Marco, in my opinion this issue should be medium priority defect.
Or even a high priority one (i took a look at current high priority
defects and they don't look much grave than this one).
Actually, i'd like to discuss issue classification in general, because
in my opinion it could use a lot of improvement. Should i do this now
on developers list, or maybe wait until 2.14 is out? Or wait for GOP?
I don't want to disrupt current development process too much.
cheers,
Janek
_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
address@hidden
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Finale2010_natsharp.png