Re: alternative notation for tuplets (idea)?

[James Lowe]

Bernado (et al)

You can read lots (lots!)  here

http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.gnu.lilypond.general/26600

and

http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.gnu.lilypond.devel/14847/focus=14853

James

On 16/10/2010 00:48, Bernardo Barros wrote:
> sorry for that. what was the rationale?
>
> 2010/10/15 Graham Percival<address@hidden>:
> > On Fri, Oct 15, 2010 at 04:52:28PM -0300, Bernardo Barros wrote:
> > > 2010/10/15 Janek Warchoł<address@hidden>:
> > > > Hi,
> > > > an idea about tuplets came to my head (and a quick seach suggested that it
> > > > wasn't discussed before).
> >
> > It _has_ been discussed before.
> >
> > > One think I don't like, since I use a lot of tuplets, is the
> > > similarity between "time" and "times".
> > > Why not \tuplet 9/8 instead of \times 8/9 ?
> >
> > It _has_ been discussed before.
> >
> > - Graham
>
> _______________________________________________
> lilypond-user mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user