Re: Lilypond performance

[ornello]

I don't want to dive too much into theoretical discussion. And, by the way, I
think Lilypond is doing an excellent job!

But consider the following example: If I breaked down my score by explicit
page breaks, my intuition would be that it should be possible to do the
typesetting job in a linear "page by page" fashion (similar to breaking the
piece into multiple bookparts).

So I suppose the performance issue is more about memory consumption than
about algorithmic runtime complexity.
-- 
View this message in context: 
http://old.nabble.com/Lilypond-performance-tp29356340p29407075.html
Sent from the Gnu - Lilypond - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.