[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Alternative polymetric representation
From: |
Arle Lommel |
Subject: |
Alternative polymetric representation |
Date: |
Mon, 14 Jun 2010 20:24:41 -0400 |
(Sorry for the lengthy post, but a couple of issues came up when I tried to
work with an older file I did some time ago.)
About 18 months ago Reinhold helped me figure out how to display time
signatures like (3+3+4)/16 in which there is a complex upper portion of the
time signature over a simple lower portion. Reinhold provided a fairly complex
fix at that time, but with updating from 2.12.2 to 2.13.18, it runs into some
problems with beat grouping. In particular running the convert does a
reasonable job except for this error:
> Not smart enough to convert beatGrouping.
> beatGrouping with a specified context must now be accomplished with
> \overrideBeamSettings.
> Please refer to the manual for details, and update manually.
OK. Fair enough, I need to look at the current manual, but there are some
problems with the documentation online that make this problematic.
If I go to here:
http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.13//Documentation/web/manuals.html
and search, it does not search the 2.13 documentation, but the 2.12
documentation (where \overrideBeamSettings is, for obvious reasons, not found).
So I modify the search string to change the version number to 2.13. Not a big
deal, just a minor annoyance, but it only brings up one hit:
http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.13/Documentation/ce/lily-547b3574.ly
Which returns a 404. (And the Google hit doesn't have a cache to look at!)
So the question is where can I find the documentation for
\overrideBeamSettings? I'd like to consult that *before* I come here and get a
RTFM response, but in this case it seems that TFM doesn't exist.
For what it's worth, what I'm trying to get right is the equivalent in function
to
http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.13//Documentation/snippets/rhythms#changing-time-signatures-inside-a-polymetric-section-using-_005cscaledurations
, but the display is quite a bit different in appearance and cleaner, e.,g.,
That was the output from 2.12.2. If I convert it and convert to PDF, I get the
following, which is (obviously) not what I want:
(I'm not sure why the first line only is doubled.)
At the time I first got Reinhold's solution, I believe he said that this time
signature notation would make it into the trunk for 2.13, but I'm not entirely
certain I recall that right.
So my question is if there is now a preferred way to accomplish this sort of
time signature in 2.13.x with autobeaming (and hopefully no unexplained
duplication of the first line of the *monophonic* score)
If anyone wants to see the entire scores in question, here is the link to the
original Lilypond file for 2.12.2, which worked under that version:
http://dl.dropbox.com/u/223919/lilypond/compound.ly
And here is the PDF:
http://dl.dropbox.com/u/223919/lilypond/compound.pdf
Here is the link to the output from the convert function (2.13.18):
http://dl.dropbox.com/u/223919/lilypond/compound2.ly
And the PDF it makes:
http://dl.dropbox.com/u/223919/lilypond/compound2.pdf
Any guidance on this would be welcome since this is digging into some pretty
obscure code.
Thanks in advance for any insights,
Arle Lommel
- Alternative polymetric representation,
Arle Lommel <=