[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Website "easier editing"
From: |
Bernardo Barros |
Subject: |
Re: Website "easier editing" |
Date: |
Fri, 7 May 2010 12:27:26 -0300 |
Yeah, that's right. One page is better. But the order is important.
Also describing how "easy" or "difficult" a method is.
On 7 May 2010 11:59, Hugh Myers <address@hidden> wrote:
> A somewhat pragmatic approach would be to use a single page suitably
> subdivided if no scrolling is involved. Else use a two page solution.
> The fewer pages a user has to link to the faster that person finds
> what they are looking for.
>
> --hsm
>
>
> On Fri, May 7, 2010 at 8:13 AM, Graham Percival
> <address@hidden> wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> Colin Campbell has been working with me on the Introduction of the
>> new website. However, we're still debating what to do with the
>> "Easier editing" page:
>> http://lilypond.org/website/easier-editing.html
>>
>> In particular, should we:
>> 1) list all programs that help or produce lilypond input code on
>> this page, or
>>
>> 2) only list a few programs here and list the rest elsewhere?
>> (probably somewhere in Usage, with a link from this page
>> to that location)
>>
>> When he began working, he had one opinion and I had the other.
>> But over the past four months, we've switched positions like a
>> finely-honed comedy act -- we still disagree, but we've both taken
>> up the other person's initial position.
>>
>> The argument for #1: we have a unified place for people to look;
>> it's easier to update; it's easier to find; etc.
>>
>> The argument for #2: it doesn't make sense to have algorithmic
>> programming environments like Strasheela and FOMUS in the same
>> list as Denemo, Frescobaldi, and LilyPondTool; having the extra
>> options will only confused newbies; if we keep 4 or 5
>> "highlighted" programs in this list and move the rest somewhere
>> else, it won't be much harder to maintain the list; etc.
>>
>>
>> I'm not particularly looking for votes on this issue -- rather,
>> I'm looking for reasons for (or against) #1 and #2 that we haven't
>> thought of. It would be great if somebody said "we should do #x
>> because XYZ" and then have us go "of course! XYZ! That makes
>> everything totally clear; we all agree due to XYZ."
>>
>>
>> If you have other concerns about the website, please don't mention
>> them here. I'll be posting other questions once this issue is
>> resolved.
>>
>> Cheers,
>> - Graham
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> lilypond-user mailing list
>> address@hidden
>> http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> lilypond-user mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
>
- Website "easier editing", Graham Percival, 2010/05/07
- Re: Website "easier editing", Hugh Myers, 2010/05/07
- Re: Website "easier editing",
Bernardo Barros <=
- Re: Website "easier editing", Bernardo Barros, 2010/05/07
- Re: Website "easier editing", joe ferguson, 2010/05/07
- Re: Website "easier editing", josé henrique padovani, 2010/05/07
- Re: Website "easier editing", Valentin Villenave, 2010/05/09