[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: triple stop warnings
From: |
Philip Potter |
Subject: |
Re: triple stop warnings |
Date: |
Sat, 12 Dec 2009 10:30:54 +0000 |
2009/12/12 David Kastrup <address@hidden>:
> "Robin Bannister" <address@hidden> writes:
>
>>> << c4*3 <g e'>2. >>
>>
>> Mmm, that was where you started. Sorry for the noise.
>
> You can get a better-looking result at the cost of quadrupling the
> number of warnings.
>
> {
> \clef "G" \relative c' {
> \once \override NoteColumn #'ignore-collision = ##t
> <<c4*3 <e g>2.>> }
> }
>
> This appears to do the right thing. Now if one finds some tweaks that
> will also reassure Lilypond that this is the right thing, that might be
> perfect.
It might be worth writing a specialist function for this; it's the
kind of notation that normally you want to disallow because the note
values don't all add up properly. In this special case, it is allowed
and has a particular meaning.
Phil
- Re: triple stop warnings, (continued)
- Re: triple stop warnings, Neil Puttock, 2009/12/11
- Re: triple stop warnings, Robin Bannister, 2009/12/12
- Re: triple stop warnings, Robin Bannister, 2009/12/12
- Re: triple stop warnings, David Kastrup, 2009/12/12
- Re: triple stop warnings,
Philip Potter <=
- Re: triple stop warnings, Jay Anderson, 2009/12/12
Re: triple stop warnings, David Pounder, 2009/12/11