Re: page break failure

[Hugh Myers]

Ah! That should be easy enough to work with--- I'll see what I can come up with.

--hsm

On Wed, Dec 2, 2009 at 12:43 AM, Marc Hohl <address@hidden> wrote:
> Hugh Myers schrieb:
>>
>> Here is the shortest template I use:
>>
>> \version "2.13.7"
>> upper = {
>>  b c d
>> }
>>
>
> Use
>
> upper = {
>  \repeat unfold 100 {
>   b c d
>  }
> }
>>
>> lower = {
>>  < gis, d e, >2.
>> }
>>
>>
>
> and
>
> lower = {
>  \repeat unfold 100 {
>   < gis, d e, >.
>  }
> }
>
> respectively.
>
> Marc
>>
>> {
>>  \time 3/4
>>  <<
>>  \new Staff \relative c'' {
>>    <<
>>      \set Score.barNumberVisibility = #all-bar-numbers-visible
>>      \bar ""
>>      \override Score.BarNumber #'break-visibility = #'#(#t #t #t)
>>      \set Score.defaultBarType = "|"
>>      \new Voice = "1" { \voiceOne \upper }
>>      \new Voice = "2" { \voiceTwo \lower }
>>    >>
>>  }
>>  \new TabStaff \relative c' {
>>    <<
>>      \new TabVoice = "t1" { \voiceOne \upper }
>>      \new TabVoice = "t2" { \voiceTwo \lower }
>>    >>
>>  }
>>  >>
>> }
>>
>> Could you show me how to modify it according to the example you sent?
>>
>> --hsm
>>
>> On Wed, Dec 2, 2009 at 12:18 AM, Hugh Myers <address@hidden> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> Second point taken. I hope you realize that 2.13 has bug fixes for
>>> 2.12--- yes? Without those, there is no project... I don't suppose you
>>> took a look? Did you notice that in included tablature? If you had,
>>> then you would perhaps have sent me a different 'Most spacing bugs can
>>> be reproduced...' Also note that I made no claim of 'BUG'. I am new at
>>> this and would more likely expect the problem to have been caused by
>>> something I did, not a bug.
>>>
>>> --hsm
>>> p.s. I am sufficiently new that I've no idea (although I can guess and
>>> goggle) what you snippet does.
>>>
>>> On Tue, Dec 1, 2009 at 11:04 PM, Graham Percival
>>> <address@hidden> wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Tue, Dec 01, 2009 at 09:57:00PM -0700, Hugh Myers wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Pardon the length of the piece of code, but clearly demonstrates the
>>>>> problem where as other pieces don't (got to be a page long for
>>>>> instance...):
>>>>>        \version "2.13.7"
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I hope that you realize that 2.13.7 is an UNSTABLE, DEVELOPMENT
>>>> release.  If you would like to participate in de-bugging, your
>>>> help would be appreciated, but please supply small,
>>>> easy-to-understand examples.
>>>>
>>>> Most spacing bugs can be reproduced with something like
>>>> \relative c' {
>>>>  \repeat unfold 128 { c4 c c c }
>>>> }
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Cheers,
>>>> - Graham
>>>>
>>>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> lilypond-user mailing list
>> address@hidden
>> http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
>>
>>
>
>