[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: developers developers developers
From: |
Graham Percival |
Subject: |
Re: developers developers developers |
Date: |
Thu, 12 Nov 2009 18:16:34 +0000 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) |
On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 04:25:40PM +0100, Bertalan Fodor (LilyPondTool) wrote:
> Good visual debugger for both scheme and C++, running well on Windows and
> Linux.
That'll take... oh, 200 hours? Sorry, but that would probably
take all the lilypond programmers over a year to write. I don't
think that's a good trade-off.
> Easy build procedure using visual tools.
Another 200 hours or more. Again, I can't see that trade-off
being worth it.
Cheers,
- Graham
- Re: developers developers developers, (continued)
- Re: developers developers developers, demery, 2009/11/12
- Re: developers developers developers, Kieren MacMillan, 2009/11/12
- Re: developers developers developers, David Kastrup, 2009/11/12
- Re: developers developers developers, demery, 2009/11/12
- Re: developers developers developers, Graham Percival, 2009/11/12
- Re: developers developers developers, Bertalan Fodor (LilyPondTool), 2009/11/12
- Re: developers developers developers,
Graham Percival <=
- Re: developers developers developers, Kieren MacMillan, 2009/11/12
- Re: developers developers developers, Jan Nieuwenhuizen, 2009/11/12
- Re: developers developers developers, Francisco Vila, 2009/11/12
- Re: developers developers developers, demery, 2009/11/12
- Re: Quit, Jan Nieuwenhuizen, 2009/11/11
- Re: Quit, David Kastrup, 2009/11/11
- Re: Quit, Graham Percival, 2009/11/11
- Re: Quit [now definitely O/T], Graham Percival, 2009/11/11
- Re: Quit [now definitely O/T], Graham Percival, 2009/11/11
- Re: Quit [now definitely O/T], David Kastrup, 2009/11/11