Re: Articulate midi script

[David Raleigh Arnold]

On Sun, 06 Sep 2009 20:49:50 +0200
Grammostola Rosea <address@hidden> wrote:

> David Raleigh Arnold wrote:
> > On Sun, 6 Sep 2009 18:53:37 +0100
> > Graham Percival <address@hidden> wrote:
> >
> >   
> >> On Sun, Sep 06, 2009 at 12:23:28PM +0200, Grammostola Rosea wrote:
> >>     
> >>> @ Valentin, yeah would be nice if we could improve the midi output by  
> >>> default. I can remember I mentioned this before, but one comment (not  
> >>> from you) was that Lilypond was mainly a notation typesetter... And  
> >>> while been busy with the lilywrap script, I was thinking, ok maybe  
> >>> that's right, but what is wrong with having both, e.g. good lay-out and  
> >>> good midi output?
> >>>       
> >> Of course there's nothing wrong with having both!  However, nobody
> >> else wants to work on midi output.
> >>     
> >
> > Again, why not get in touch with the developer(s) of midge? The
> > syntax is completely different, but it is *text-based* and GNU.
> > It is dedicated to midi, not notation.  Why not find a way to
> > use their work, at worst by means of a translation script?
> > Regards, daveA
> >
> >
> >   
> Could an improved articulate script no be enough? What can Midge add to 
> Lilypond midi?
> 
> \r

Everything lilypond doesn't have. daveA