[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Lilypond Speed
From: |
Graham Percival |
Subject: |
Re: Lilypond Speed |
Date: |
Fri, 4 Sep 2009 22:05:12 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) |
On Fri, Sep 04, 2009 at 10:52:13PM +0200, Valentin Villenave wrote:
> Actually, I stumbled upon something very odd: though I haven't the
> exact numbers, with 2.12 my opera used to compile in ~40 minutes on
> Win32, ~25 minutes on Linux64 -- but now that I have upgraded to the
> latest git sources (that include Joe's recent work on vertical
> spacing), it takes more than... 90 minutes!!!
> (the PDF looks nicer though).
How is that odd? More complicated algorithms take more time. I
haven't followed the details of the spacing changes, but I'd
certainly expect them to take longer.
Cheers,
- Graham
- Re: Lilypond Speed, (continued)
- Re: Lilypond Speed, Michael David Crawford, 2009/09/01
- RE: Lilypond Speed, Nick Payne, 2009/09/02
- RE: Lilypond Speed, Nick Payne, 2009/09/03
- Re: Lilypond Speed, Tim McNamara, 2009/09/03
- Re: Lilypond Speed, Pierre Couderc, 2009/09/03
- Re: Lilypond Speed, Bertalan Fodor (LilyPondTool), 2009/09/03
- Re: Lilypond Speed, Frank Steinmetzger, 2009/09/03
Re: Lilypond Speed, Tim Reeves, 2009/09/03
Re: Lilypond Speed, Jonathan Wilkes, 2009/09/03
Re: Lilypond Speed, Tim Reeves, 2009/09/04