[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: new website draft 8: almost giving up
From: |
Mark Polesky |
Subject: |
Re: new website draft 8: almost giving up |
Date: |
Thu, 13 Aug 2009 22:46:00 -0700 (PDT) |
Graham Percival wrote:
> And even if some of our users *are* the webmasters, it doesn't
> make sense for them to add a big annoucement about lilypond at
> thie moment, does it?
>
> Besides, asking our users to advertize our site will *also* be
> easier when we have a new site. I mean, it gives a good excuse to
> motivate people, right?
Oh, maybe I misread your earlier comment. I was thinking
links,
not announcements.
> > I think we could boost our rank significantly by having the exact
> > phrase "free music notation software" in our description field.
>
> The meta description field, or the "what is lilypond" box? If
> you're talking about the "what is lilypond" box, then please
> supply the exact new text you're proposing. I'm completely fed up
> with crafting and re-crafting those two (or more) sentences.
>From an SEO perspective, the meta description is worth a lot more
than the "What is LilyPond" box:
<meta name="description" content="LilyPond... free music notation software.">
> > Maybe it lacks the poetic qualities of "...for everyone", but it's
> > worth discussing if you're going for SEO.
>
> I'm not convinced it's worth going for SEO, but if you want to
> re-open the motto debate, that's fine.
Maybe you could split the difference and have the motto we like in
the <h1> tag, and the search-phrase in the <title>. I'm not going
to fight over this though; these are just some ideas.
> I'm happy to accept a compliment, but I don't understand the
> comment. If you're suggesting that the general public understands
> "free", then I disagree. If you're suggesting that the
> "free-aware" fraction of the population outnumbers the
> "non-free-aware" fraction of the population, then I also disagree.
I think you wrote something about the word "free" being a
detractor for certain demographics. And I wasn't referring to
"free-aware" either. All I was suggesting was that I think you'll
attract more customers than you'll detract if you have "free" in
your target phrase. Because we Americans are greedy.
> In any case, I can't believe that "Why do developers work on free
> software", in a special box of its own, would make the website
> harder to navigate.
No, it won't. I think Jan was just saying that there might be a
better place for it. I actually like that section. Maybe it could
go somewhere else, but I don't know. It's pretty small right now.
It doesn't really bother me there. It is a little FAQy; if we had
an on-site FAQ, that would be a better place. But whatever, there
are probably more important things to work on anyway.
- Re: new website draft 8: almost giving up, (continued)
- Re: new website draft 8: almost giving up, Trevor Daniels, 2009/08/13
- Re: new website draft 8: almost giving up, Bertalan Fodor (LilyPondTool), 2009/08/13
- Re: new website draft 8: almost giving up, Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2009/08/13
- Re: new website draft 8: almost giving up, Jan Nieuwenhuizen, 2009/08/13
- Re: new website draft 8: almost giving up, Graham Percival, 2009/08/13
- Re: new website draft 8: almost giving up, Mark Polesky, 2009/08/14
- Re: new website draft 8: almost giving up, Graham Percival, 2009/08/14
- Re: new website draft 8: almost giving up,
Mark Polesky <=
- Re: new website draft 8: almost giving up, Graham Percival, 2009/08/14
- Re: new website draft 8: almost giving up, Bertalan Fodor (LilyPondTool), 2009/08/13
Re: new website draft 8: almost giving up, Patrick McCarty, 2009/08/11
Message not available
Re: new website non-git help, Marek Klein, 2009/08/12
Re: new website non-git help, Trevor Daniels, 2009/08/12
Re: new website draft 8: almost giving up, Jan Nieuwenhuizen, 2009/08/12