[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Unicode chars in scheme?
From: |
Mark Polesky |
Subject: |
Re: Unicode chars in scheme? |
Date: |
Wed, 24 Jun 2009 01:06:36 -0700 (PDT) |
Tao Cumplido wrote:
> Thanks. It didn't work right away but I figured it out.
>
> (display #x00a9) -> 169>
> (display (char? #x00a9)) -> #f
> (display (number? #x00a9)) -> #t
> (display (integer->char #x00a9)) -> ©
>
> I still wish there was a direct way but this will do.
This is also an option:
(define (display-unicode x)
(display (integer->char x)))
(display-unicode #xa9)
(for-each display-unicode
(list #x66 #x6f #x6f #x62 #x61 #x72 #xa9))
HTH
- Mark
- Unicode chars in scheme?, Tao Cumplido, 2009/06/23
- Re: Unicode chars in scheme?, Trevor Daniels, 2009/06/24
- Re: Unicode chars in scheme?, Tao Cumplido, 2009/06/24
- Re: Unicode chars in scheme?,
Mark Polesky <=
- Re: Unicode chars in scheme?, Tao Cumplido, 2009/06/24
- Re: Unicode chars in scheme?, Mark Polesky, 2009/06/24
- Re: Unicode chars in scheme?, Tao Cumplido, 2009/06/24
- Re: Unicode chars in scheme?, Mark Polesky, 2009/06/24
- Re: Unicode chars in scheme?, Tao Cumplido, 2009/06/25
- Re: Unicode chars in scheme?, Neil Puttock, 2009/06/24