[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Real-world usage of Lilypond
From: |
Neil Puttock |
Subject: |
Re: Real-world usage of Lilypond |
Date: |
Sat, 11 Apr 2009 17:07:12 +0100 |
2009/4/11 Graham Percival <address@hidden>:
> On Fri, Apr 10, 2009 at 03:57:03PM +0200, Christ van Willegen wrote:
>> It seems that (parts of) Lily is in C++, which I've been using since
>> 1995. So, I can read and (probably) bugfix in it. I guess I'll have to
>> learn other languages on the way as well, including .ly (since it's
>> changed a lot sometimes!)
>
> I would say that scheme is more important than C++. Also note
> that you can do bugfixes in scheme without recompiling lilypond --
> this way you wouldn't need to mess around with any virtual
> machines, C++ compilers, etc.
In my experience of bugfixing, I'd say C++ is more important; I'd be
surprised if the majority of issues in the tracker don't involve some
C++ code.
>> So, you can probably add me to the list of Frogs. Is there a 'central
>> place' for new people to 'gather and discuss'?
>
> Yes, there's a Frog mailist, but I can't remember the address
> offhand. If Valentin had his website up, I could find the address
> there.
http://listengine.tuxfamily.org/lilynet.net/frogs/
Regards,
Neil
- Re: Real-world usage of Lilypond, (continued)
- Re: Real-world usage of Lilypond, Wei-Wei Guo, 2009/04/08
- Re: Real-world usage of Lilypond, Tim McNamara, 2009/04/09
- Re: Real-world usage of Lilypond, Wei-Wei Guo, 2009/04/09
- Re: Real-world usage of Lilypond, M Watts, 2009/04/09
- Re: Real-world usage of Lilypond, Wei-Wei Guo, 2009/04/09
- Re: Real-world usage of Lilypond, Tim McNamara, 2009/04/09
- Re: Real-world usage of Lilypond, Anthony W. Youngman, 2009/04/09
Re: Real-world usage of Lilypond, Graham Percival, 2009/04/09
Re: Real-world usage of Lilypond, Morten Borchorst, 2009/04/09
Re: Real-world usage of Lilypond, wilco van den tol, 2009/04/09