Marc Hohl wrote:
I think you should also add:
\override TabVoice.Tie #'transparent = ##t
Yes, of course. But then another problem occurs: if the tie isn't
visible, it looks as if there are two distinct
notes. Therefore, I think strongly about a scheme function (which at
the end should be hidden in the
TabVoice-context) which translates, e.g.
c4 d e2 ~ e4. e8
to
c4 d e2 s4. e8
so the spurious tablature number disappears in the output. From
earlier postings I knew that there are
several functions about automatically calculating intervals etc., but
I'm a scheme newbie. So I would be
glad if someone out there would give me a hint how to start writing
such a function.
It should be noted that a publishing standard is when there is a Note
Staff + Tab Staff, tied notes (that is, the notes that are 'held') in
the Tab Staff are indicated by parenthesizing the tab number(s). There
are several conventions that are related to tied notes in a Notes+Tab
situation:
* Tab numbers that are 'tied to' are sometimes parenthesized,
sometimes hidden.
* In the case that 'tied to' notes are hidden, a parenthesized tab
number is usually forced if the 'tied to' note is at the beginning
of a line (i.e., the note is tied over a system break).
* Likewise, parenthesized tab numbers are forced when a 'tied to'
note begins a 2nd ending or Coda section.
* A parenthesized chord in the Tab Staff are indicated with a single
pair of parentheses surrounding all of the notes in the chord (as
opposed to as single pair of parentheses around each individual
note in the chord).