[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: SOLVED: going backwards in time
From: |
Neil Puttock |
Subject: |
Re: SOLVED: going backwards in time |
Date: |
Wed, 17 Sep 2008 21:30:44 +0100 |
2008/9/6 Adam James Wilson <address@hidden>:
> Hi Han-Wen,
>
> Thanks for the reply. The example I sent was actually a quite simplified
> version of what I'm attempting to do; there is a real possibility that in my
> actual scores I will cause the 64-bit 'long long' numbers to overflow as
> well. As you mentioned yourself before, I think the airtight solution is to
> use rationals or arbitrary precision.
Just to let you know, the next development release will have support
for 64-bit rationals.
I imagine arbitrary precision will have to wait for the next
development cycle, since we're approaching the release of 2.12.
Regards,
Neil