lilypond-user
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: arpeggio problems


From: Mats Bengtsson
Subject: Re: arpeggio problems
Date: Mon, 01 Sep 2008 12:02:28 +0200
User-agent: Internet Messaging Program (IMP) H3 (4.0.5)

What typesetting layout would you propose in these situations, where
the arpeggio is too short to fit in the zigzag or arrow head or ...?
Should the arpeggio be extended somewhat above and below the notes of
the chord, or ...?

As a workaround, you could add invisible note heads to the chord.

  /Mats

Quoting Eluze <address@hidden>:


sorry - i forgot to append the picture...
http://www.nabble.com/file/p19251669/arpeggio%2Bbug.png

Eluze wrote:

hi

when the notes of a chord are close problems with arpeggios arise
- \arpeggioNormal - the zigzag line cannot be recognised as such
- \arpeggioArrowUp - the arrow is below the chord, the zigzag line is
missing
- \arpeggioArrowUp - the arrow is below the chord, the zigzag line is
missing
- \arpeggioParenthesis - the parenthesis can nearly be distinguished
- \arpeggioBracket - this is the only really visible and readable
arpeggio!

\version "2.11.57"
\layout { ragged-right = ##t }
{
 \arpeggioNormal < e'' g'' > 1 \arpeggio
 \arpeggioArrowUp < e'' g'' > 1 \arpeggio
 \arpeggioArrowDown < e'' g'' > 1 \arpeggio
 \arpeggioParenthesis < e'' g'' > 1 \arpeggio
 \arpeggioBracket < e'' g'' > 1 \arpeggio
}

is there a way to tweak this or is it a bug?
thanx
-eluze


_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
address@hidden
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user



--
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/arpeggio-problems-tp19251408p19251669.html
Sent from the Gnu - Lilypond - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.



_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
address@hidden
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user








reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]