Re: LSR status

[Graham Percival]

On 8/26/08, Valentin Villenave <address@hidden> wrote:
> 2008/8/25 Kieren MacMillan <address@hidden>:
>
> Hi Kieren,
>
>> However, if the Lilypond community is depending on *any* resource as
>> heavily
>> as it appears to be (or want to be) relying on the LSR, that resource
>> needs
>> to maintain ~ 99% uptime.
>
> The LSR brings many advantages and it would be a disaster to not have
> it anymore.

I wouldn't say that it would be a disaster; I still don't think that
it's been used enough to say that the loss would be *that* bad.

> And note that many LSR snippets are duplicated in LilyPond sources
> (input/lsr/).

Indeed -- if LSR dropped off the face of the planet, the docs would be
entirely unaffected.  I wouldn't have allows the system to be set up
in any other way.

Cheers,
- Graham