lilypond-user
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Comments on Learning Manual 3 -- Fundamental concepts


From: John Mandereau
Subject: Comments on Learning Manual 3 -- Fundamental concepts
Date: Sat, 9 Aug 2008 18:15:35 +0200

Hi Trevor,

I proofread chapter 3 of the Learning Manual up to 3.1.4 'Modifying
context properties'.  This is globally great work, I wish I could read
such docs instead of spending hours in trial-and-error and reading
Mats' explanations on -user, when I started with LilyPond 4 years ago
:-).

I read it in Info format within Emacs, so I saw some issues with the
way cross-references look; it might be useful to nitpick about this
output format if we distribute Info docs with GUB later, and anyway
LilyPond packages for GNU/Linux distros (e.g Fedora) certainly already
include Info docs.

I made many changes in a commit (patch attached), the detailed message
gives motivation for some changes.  After second thought, I think
changes that intend to explain some details better are not welcome in
LM, because it's not worth the effort for beginners making the effort
to understand such details.  Current explanations I propose to replace
should probably remain intact: even if they simplify some details and
are even sometimes a bit wrong, they are simple enough for beginners;
if we go this way hiding details and lying a little, we must add 'See
also' links to NR sections where details are well expained.  If
necessary, I can make a new patch to add to NR changes that can't be
added to LM, and a new patch for LM3.  What do you think?

There are also two details below I'm not sure about.

3.1.2 Score is a (single) compound musical expression
-----------------------------------------------------

"""Start with the outer layer"""
I thought that the common word for this was "level", but maybe "layer"
makes more sense or is easier to understand.

3.2.1 I'm hearing Voices
------------------------

"""the notes from the third and fourth voices are
displaced to if necessary to avoid the note heads colliding."""
          ^^
Is the first "to" intentional? (Oh, I'm not an English grammar
specialist, you know, I probably sound like a dummy Frog here :-p)

I'll come back again later with comments and changes on LM 3-4.

Cheers,
John

Attachment: 0004-Proofread-LM3-Fundamental-concepts-up-to-Modifying.patch
Description: Binary data


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]