[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: sustainOn
From: |
Graham Percival |
Subject: |
Re: sustainOn |
Date: |
Tue, 8 Jul 2008 12:13:02 -0700 |
On Tue, 08 Jul 2008 16:55:11 +0200
"James E. Bailey" <address@hidden> wrote:
> See, this is why I should subscribe to the development list___
If you're concerned about development, then yes. You might want
to look at the archives, where you'll see a whole bloody MONTH for
this discussion, multiple "if you have any objections, speak up
now", etc.
> Lilypond
> syntax is really logical, this is a step in the illogical direction,
> if you ask me.
It's completely logical. Now, Up/Down/Both refer *only* to
directions. Sustain isn't for directions.
> I vote, as a pianist, for sustainDown/sustainUp. Who's with me?
I vote, as one of the main developers, that there is no Maoing way
we're going to revert this change.
- Graham