Re: scheme function for staccato

[Mats Bengtsson]

Quoting Valentin Villenave <address@hidden>:

> > > % To modify a sequence of notes, it's easiest to use a filter:
>
> This approach seems to differ from
> http://lsr.dsi.unimi.it/LSR/Item?id=82

Reminder to Mats: Always check in LSR first! ;-)

> Mats, Reinhold, can you give us some explanations about these
> differences? Which one is the best? The simplest? The most reliable?
> Should I edit the LSR snippet? Add a new snippet? etc.

The solution in LSR is more or less equivalent to Reinhold's proposal, 
but is divided three separate functions instead of two, whereof two are 
generic and can be used for any articulation.

However, it turns out that the solution shares the same problem as
Reinhold's solution, which you can see if you replace the score by
\score {
 \relative c'' {
   a b \addStacc { c, c }  }
 \layout{ ragged-right = ##t }
}


The same fix that I proposed can be used also here, i.e. to replace the 
definition of add-script by
#(define (add-script m x)
  (if
    (equal? (ly:music-property m 'name) 'EventChord)
    (set! (ly:music-property m 'elements)
          (append (ly:music-property m 'elements)
                   (list (make-script x)))))
  m)

   /Mats
> Cheers,
> Valentin