Re: absolute & relative together

[David Bobroff]

Um, no, not at all.  That's not the problem.  Looking at it some more it 
seems that what I need is more clef changes in and out of the cues in 
order to insure that different transpositions of the main part,including 
transpositions involving different clefs will produce the results I'm after.

-David

Graham Percival wrote:
> Isn't this what \transposition and/or octave checks are for?
> Please see NR 1.1 Pitches.
>
> Cheers,
> - Graham
>
> On Mon, 10 Mar 2008 21:39:15 +0000
> David Bobroff <address@hidden> wrote:
>
> > I've realized that I may have painted myself into a bit of a corner. 
> > I'm working on an orchestral part with cues.  The main part needs to
> > be transposed.  I have defined the cues and the main part in separate 
> > blocks.  I have used \relative for both.  Now I'm realizing that
> > perhaps it would have been more clever to define the cues with
> > absolute pitches rather than using \relative so I can really freeze
> > their positions (I want the cues at their original pitches when the
> > main part is transposed).
> >
> > Is there an elegant fix for this or do I simply have to go through
> > the cue definitions and enter all the , and ' for their absolute
> > pitches?
> >
> > -David
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > lilypond-user mailing list
> > address@hidden
> > http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user