[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: collision, is there a workaround?
From: |
Valentin Villenave |
Subject: |
Re: collision, is there a workaround? |
Date: |
Thu, 10 Jan 2008 11:30:00 +0100 |
2008/1/10, Mats Bengtsson <address@hidden>:
> Right, that's what I mean. If you compare to 2.10, you will see a
> significant difference.
I have to take your word here :)
> The fact that
> \relative c''' { a8\rest \once \override Score.SeparationItem #'padding
> = #10 ais4 }
> doesn't make any difference is also a regression against 2.10.
I have mentioned it on the Issue's page.
> My apologies, I had several small examples in the same file and didn't
> notice that
> I had this setting earlier in the file.
This is the FIRST TIME EVER that I see a (smallest) mistake in one of
your mails!
After all, who knows, you might be human in the end... :-)
Cheers,
Valentin
- collision, is there a workaround?, Ole Schmidt, 2008/01/09
- Re: collision, is there a workaround?, Mats Bengtsson, 2008/01/10
- Re: collision, is there a workaround?, Damian leGassick, 2008/01/10
- Re: collision, is there a workaround?, Mats Bengtsson, 2008/01/10
- Re: collision, is there a workaround?, Valentin Villenave, 2008/01/10
- Re: collision, is there a workaround?, Mats Bengtsson, 2008/01/10
- Re: collision, is there a workaround?,
Valentin Villenave <=
- Re: collision, is there a workaround?, Mats Bengtsson, 2008/01/10