Re: problem with 12/16 beaming

[Hans Aberg]

On 4 Dec 2007, at 13:03, Trevor Daniels wrote:

> > I think you made a typo here, because you made a
> > function to fix it
> > for the meter 12/16, but then entered 24/32,
> > where the beaming comes
> > out correctly with only using the quadruplets
> > straight off.
>
> Whoops!  Yes - but at least the music function
> was right, in spite of my test being wrong!

I think though that the 24/32 variation might be the most practical,  
because the quadrupltes might have other stuff in them. But thanks  
for the suggestions.

  Hans Aberg