[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: once again with a header, tie into polyphony question
From: |
Eyolf Østrem |
Subject: |
Re: once again with a header, tie into polyphony question |
Date: |
Thu, 22 Nov 2007 03:40:56 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.15-muttng (2007-04-06) |
On 21.11.2007 (13:58), Rune Zedeler wrote:
> Ole Schmidt skrev:
>
> > I want to have both of the first two notes tied -the d and the f-sharp. How
> > do I achieve
> > that?
Another possibility is to fake it by letting a stemless (i.e. transparent
stem) in one voice be merged with that of another: the head is still there,
and can therefore start a tie, but it appears as if the ties change from
one voice to another. Below is the first measure of Fernando Sor's Fantasie
elegiaque, which requires the notes of a grace-like arpeggio to be tied to
three different voices. It may not be the prettiest code in the world, but
at least it works....
(BTW, I thought there was supposed to be something like
\override Staff.NoteCollision #'merge-differently-dotted = ##t
\override Staff.NoteCollision #'merge-differently-headed = ##t
in there, but apparently, it works)
\relative c' {
\key e\minor
\time 4/4
<<
{
\set Staff.tieWaitForNote = ##t
\partial 64*5
\voiceOne \slurDown
a64\f fis' c'
\tieDown
dis64~ c'
\stemUp
<dis, c'>4..
\times 2/5 { b'32 a g fis e } dis8
}
\\
{
\voiceTwo
s64
\once \override Stem #'transparent = ##t
fis,64~
\noBeam \once \override Stem #'transparent = ##t
c'64*3~ <fis, c'>4..
}
\\
{
\voiceFour
\once \override Stem #'transparent = ##t
\tieDown
a,64*5 ~
\stemDown a2
}
>>
}
Eyolf
--
Non-sequiturs make me eat lampshades.
- once again with a header, tie into polyphony question, Ole Schmidt, 2007/11/20
- Re: once again with a header, tie into polyphony question, Paul Scott, 2007/11/20
- RE: once again with a header, tie into polyphony question, Trevor Daniels, 2007/11/21
- Re: once again with a header, tie into polyphony question, Rune Zedeler, 2007/11/21
- Re: once again with a header, tie into polyphony question,
Eyolf Østrem <=