[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Polyphony clarification
|
From: |
Charles Gran |
|
Subject: |
Re: Polyphony clarification |
|
Date: |
Tue, 13 Nov 2007 07:09:15 -0800 |
On 12 Nov 2007 at 16:41, Mats Bengtsson wrote:
> > So \upper could be a name of a voice that could have \voiceTwo
> > properties?
> >
> That wouldn't make sense, since \voiceTwo is equivalent to
> \stemDown \slurDown \tieDown \dynamicDown ...
> and you typically want everything to point upwards in an upper voice, right?
Right, I realized that I meant \voiceOne after I sent it. Thanks for
all information!
Charles