Re: GDP: pitches second draft

[Graham Percival]

I agree with Mats.  As a further caution, Rune: if your patch 
significantly changes the input format, the chances of it being accepted 
are lower.

Cheers,
- Graham


Mats Bengtsson wrote:
> How would this affect the user interface? I got the impression that it was
> mostly a matter of the internal representation in the implementation.
>
>   /Mats
>
> Rune Zedeler wrote:
> > I am working on splitting the pitch into pitchclass and pitch. - 
> > Pitchclasses not containing octave information.
> > I am not nearly finished with this, and perhaps the whole thing will 
> > be rejected.
> > But I think it would be a shame to do a lot of work on the Pitch 
> > documentation just before a change like this might occur. Surely the 
> > docs would have to be somewhat rewritten.
> >
> > -Rune
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > lilypond-user mailing list
> > address@hidden
> > http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user