|
From: | Mats Bengtsson |
Subject: | Re: Copyrights (was Re: No time/no bars) |
Date: | Wed, 21 Mar 2007 20:35:26 +0100 |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.7.8) Gecko/20061113 Debian/1.7.8-1sarge8 |
Mike Blackstock wrote:
In Canada, it's 50 years after the death of the relevant people. In many (all?) jurisdictions, a published music manuscript - the layout, fonts, etc. - is considered artwork, and hence falls under copyright law, regardless of whether or not the music itself is in the public domain. My understanding is that you can work from a copyrighted score to prepare a new edition as long as you restrict yourself to using the non-copyrighted part of the score: the composer's notes, phrasing slurs, and so on. Evidently, if you're making a new edition with lilypond, you won't be using anyone else's layout etc so that shouldn't be a concern I would think.
The problem is to know what originates from the composer and what from the editor. Even in the case of "Urtext editions" where all added slurs are dotted, it's often the case that the editor has worked from several sources, such as handwritten manuscripts (often more than one), the first print, ... and the decisions on which of these to trust for each note/slur/whatever will also belong to the editors copyright. Search the mailing list archives for the mutopia mailing list and the information related to copyright at the Mutopia web page to learn more about all these troubles. /Mats
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |