[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Catching error messages
From: |
Cameron Horsburgh |
Subject: |
Re: Catching error messages |
Date: |
Thu, 15 Feb 2007 07:20:24 +1100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11) |
On Wed, Feb 14, 2007 at 02:45:46PM +0100, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
> Cameron Horsburgh escreveu:
> > On Mon, Feb 12, 2007 at 12:09:39PM +0100, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
> >
> >> don't; -dlog-file=foo is the recommended method. -dseparate-log-files if
> >> you need multiple logs.
> >
> > I might have this wrong, but I have problems with each of these:
> >
> > lilypond -dlog-file=log foo.ly
>
> Please file a bug. It's called foo.log, btw.
>
I tried that, and it brought up an error, which I've added to the bug
report.
Is the requirement to use 'foo.log' necessary, or convention?
--
=============================================
Cameron Horsburgh
=============================================
- Catching error messages, Cameron Horsburgh, 2007/02/11
- Re: Catching error messages, Geoff Horton, 2007/02/11
- Re: Catching error messages, Graham Percival, 2007/02/11
- Re: Catching error messages, Cameron Horsburgh, 2007/02/11
- Re: Catching error messages, Graham Percival, 2007/02/11
- Re: Catching error messages, Cameron Horsburgh, 2007/02/11
- Re: Catching error messages, Graham Percival, 2007/02/12
- Re: Catching error messages, Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2007/02/12
- Re: Catching error messages, Cameron Horsburgh, 2007/02/14
- Re: Catching error messages, Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2007/02/14
- Re: Catching error messages,
Cameron Horsburgh <=
- Re: Catching error messages, Graham Percival, 2007/02/14