|
From: | Frédéric Chiasson |
Subject: | Re: Constructive Criticism and a Question |
Date: | Tue, 19 Dec 2006 23:27:44 -0500 |
Jonathan Henkelman escreveu:
> Erik Sandberg <mandolaerik <at> gmail.com> writes:
>
>> I think these changes sound scary, it is an additional hack in the parser
>> machinery. I think it would be cleaner if \times could be changed to a
> proper
>> music function, e.g. as
>> \tuplet 2 3 {...}
>> This would remove rules from the parser instead of adding them.
>>
>> (Hm, my suggestion is not really in line with this discussion; I can agree
>> that \tuplet 2 3 would be easier to confuse with "3:2" than \tuplet 2/3 is).
>>
>
> I think Eriks point is actually well founded. The discussion started with my
> discussion of trying to trim down the grammer complexity. Adding syntax is not
> really in that direction.
>
> That being said, \tuplet 2 3 {...} is rather confusing. I can live with
Another option:
- add \tuplet 3:2 {.. }
- replace \times 2/3 by \times #'(2 . 3) ; this can be implemented with
a standard music function
--
Han-Wen Nienhuys - address@hidden - http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanwen
LilyPond Software Design
-- Code for Music Notation
http://www.lilypond-design.com
_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
address@hidden
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |