[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[OT] Extreme delays in delivery...
From: |
Gilles |
Subject: |
[OT] Extreme delays in delivery... |
Date: |
Fri, 24 Feb 2006 23:14:58 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.11 |
Hello.
[I'm sorry to bother the list with mail management problems; in case there
is a better place, please let me know.]
Earlier today, I already mentioned there were big delays, and in fact I've
now received the posting (with subject "Auto-beam override") which I thought
was lost.
Here is an excerpt of the mail header:
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org)
by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
id 1FChdI-0003cW-Hd
for address@hidden; Fri, 24 Feb 2006 13:25:36 -0500
Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
id 1FCB4p-00029h-TD
for address@hidden; Thu, 23 Feb 2006 02:39:52 -0500
Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
id 1FC9ZB-0006Vt-4G
for address@hidden; Thu, 23 Feb 2006 01:04:04 -0500
Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FC3os-0005ui-HA
for address@hidden; Wed, 22 Feb 2006 18:54:55 -0500
Received: from [193.74.71.23] (helo=oola.is.scarlet.be)
by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1FC3vS-0005ZS-4s
for address@hidden; Wed, 22 Feb 2006 19:01:43 -0500
It show thats the mail had been in transit in "lists.gnu.org" during
~6 hours ("spam-scanned"), plus ~1 hour and a half ("tmda-scanned")
and finally ~35 hours, totalling to over 42 hours!
This is rather long, isn't it?
Are the maintainers of the machines/softwares involved aware of the
problem? Is this going to be fixed, or should we be getting used to
the situation?
Best regards,
Gilles
[Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread] |
- [OT] Extreme delays in delivery...,
Gilles <=