Re: GNU clarification

[Jan Nieuwenhuizen]

Vaylor Trucks writes:

> I was not able to (quckly) find this info on the site or in the list
> archives.  Suppose I want to use Lilypond to generate output which
> would then be inserted into a book which I intend to sell:
>
> 1. is this a violation of the GNU?

What makes you think that?

> 2. if not, what attribution (if any) needs to be present in the final
>    materials?

Unless you distribute parts of LilyPond itself, there are no
obligations.  If you think LilyPond is useful, you are encouraged to
support the project by mentioning LilyPond was used to produce your book.

Jan.

-- 
Jan Nieuwenhuizen <address@hidden> | GNU LilyPond - The music typesetter
http://www.xs4all.nl/~jantien       | http://www.lilypond.org