Pythonization (was Re: Roadmap to lily code)

[andrea valle]

(Could be of some interest so I keep it on the list)

> I'm also not sure it's a good idea. If you want python, it would be 
> better to start afresh with a python version of LilyPond, and move 
> speed-critical things to C(++). Then, end-result will be more 
> "pythonic"

And in that case? Could you make a rough estimation? Is it feasible or 
is it (as a matter of facts) science fiction?

> I imagine that the end result will be slower than the current 
> GUILE/Scheme combo.
My coding time is precious than machine's working one:)

-a-


> --
>  Han-Wen Nienhuys - address@hidden - http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanwen
Andrea Valle
DAMS - Facoltà di Scienze della Formazione
Università degli Studi di Torino
address@hidden