Re: Debian (Woody) packages for Lilypond 1.9.6

[Ferenc Wagner]

Han-Wen Nienhuys <address@hidden> writes:

>>> address@hidden writes:
>>>
>>>> autotrace 0.29 is enough.
>>>
>>> 0.30 is necessary for mftrace. 0.29 works but crashes
>>> sometimes.
>>
>> I thought the mftrace dependency was artifical, since I
>> never had any problems.  Since it is also a Build-dep
>> only, I probably will not compile autotrace.
>
> you will get clunky PDFs, which is why I think we should
> make mftrace mandatory.

I have got no objection to mftrace, I was talking about
autotrace.  If I understand you correctly, 0.29 is OK as
long as it does not crash.  Well, it works for me, does it
provide noticeably inferior quality to 0.30?

>>> We had many hard-to-trace coredump problems with this
>>> GCC version.

I think core dumps in LilyPond, not GCC, right?  Then it is
a real danger, with which I can live it for a while.  :)
Especially if nobody is interested apart from me...

Feri.